Testing and treatment for hepatitis C in gay and bisexual men with HIV in Melbourne reduced the prevalence of the infection by 83% between 2012 and 2019, Australian researchers report in Clinical Infectious Diseases.
The findings are an example of hepatitis C micro-elimination.
Micro-elimination refers to efforts to eliminate hepatitis C infection in defined populations or settings. A focus on populations or setting where prevalence is high, and transmission is ongoing will help to reduce prevalence and incidence of hepatitis C. Gay and bisexual men with HIV and people who inject drugs are priorities for micro-elimination efforts.
The Melbourne region has the second-largest number of people living with HIV in Australia and in common with Europe and North America, the incidence of hepatitis C among gay and bisexual men with HIV rose after 2000 in Australia.
The co-EC study was designed to investigate the effectiveness and impact of direct-acting antiviral treatment for hepatitis C in people living with HIV in Melbourne. The study recruited participants at general medical practices with HIV-positive patients and two hospitals providing HIV care in the city. The 22 study sites provide care for around 85% of gay and bisexual men with HIV in Melbourne.
The study recruited 200 people with HIV between 2016 and 2018 who tested positive for HCV antibodies. Two people spontaneously cleared hepatitis C infection before starting treatment. The remainder had chronic HCV infection, confirmed by HCV RNA testing.
One hundred and ninety-eight participants were male, with a median age of 47 years. Thirty percent had acquired hepatitis C through sharing injecting equipment, 36% through sex with another man, 2% through blood transfusion, 1.5% through tattooing or body piercing. The source of infection was unknown or unreported in 25% of participants.
A substantial proportion of participants reported recent behaviours that posed a risk of onward hepatitis transmission. Sixty-four participants reported inconsistent condom use with casual partners in the previous six months (hepatitis C can be transmitted during condomless anal intercourse) and 40 reported sharing needles for injecting. Thirty-three percent had injected in the previous months, in all cases reporting methamphetamine use.
Almost all participants (95%) were taking antiretroviral treatment and 91% had an undetectable viral load.
One hundred and eighty-six participants started direct-acting antiviral treatment, 128 in primary care and 58 through a hospital HIV clinic. There was no difference between settings in the uptake of treatment (93%). The study authors say that high treatment uptake in general practice was attributable to specialist nursing support. Nurses trained staff and educated study participants.
The most frequently prescribed regimens were sofosbuvir/ledipasvir (Harvoni) (46%) and sofosbuvir (Sovaldi)/daclatasvir (Daklinza) (47%).
Among all participants who started treatment, 84% achieved a sustained virologic response. Seven people were lost to follow-up after starting treatment and six discontinued treatmenrt
One hundred and seventy-three people completed treatment and 163 attended for an HCV viral load test 12 weeks after completion of treatment. Of the 163, 160 achieved a sustained virologic response (98%). There was no difference in response rates according to hepatitis C genotype or by type of treatment site.
Three cases of reinfection occurred during a median follow-up period of 10 months, a rate of 2.5 per 100 person-years of follow-up.
As well as evaluating the effectiveness of treatment, the study also investigated the impact of curing hepatitis C on hepatitis C prevalence and incidence in gay and bisexual men living with HIV engaged in care at the trial sites.
Between 2218 and 3083 gay and bisexual men with HIV were engaged in care and had previously tested negative for hepatitis C between 2012 and 2019. Of these, between 50% and 60% received an HCV antibody test each year. Between 2015 and 2019, the proportion of people with HCV antibodies who also had a positive HCV RNA result fell from 60% to 9%, a reduction of 83%, showing that an increasing proportion of those tested each year had been cured of hepatitis C.
New HCV infections also fell. 112 new infections were detected during the study period. New infections in people attending primary care sites fell by an average of 25% per year, from 27 in 2012 to 2 in 2019, with the greatest impact after 2015, when infections fell from 25 to 12 in one year.
The study authors say that their findings are probably applicable to other high-income settings where hepatitis C medication and access to healthcare is highly subsidised by government. Specialist nurse-led support was also important for achieving high treatment uptake. In this setting, a focussed treatment programme achieved a rapid reduction in hepatitis C prevalence and incidence, suggesting that this level of support might only be needed for a few years.
In an accompanying editorial, Taiwanese researchers say that for micro-elimination approaches to achieve wider success, several conditions need to be met. Comprehensive education on hepatitis C treatment for healthcare providers and people with HIV along with easily accessible screening can improve the uptake of treatment. Governments need to negotiate affordable prices with pharmaceutical companies and allocate funds for hepatitis C treatment and care to enable expansion of treatment. Finally, harm reduction measures to prevent new infections or re-infection need to be in place to maintain reductions in prevalence.