Viekirax
(ombitasvir and paritaprevir with ritonavir) was highly effective in curing
hepatitis C without the accompaniment of dasabuvir (Exviera) in Japanese people with genotype 1b hepatitis C infection
in the GIFT 1 trial, researchers reported last month at the International
Liver Congress in Vienna, Austria.
Viekirax and Exviera are direct-acting antivirals
developed by AbbVie. In the European Union, they have been approved as separate
products, recommended for use in combination with each other, for treatment of
genotype 1 infection. In the United States, they have been approved as a
co-packaged product called Viekira Pak,
for treatment of genotype 1.
However, due to a genetic difference in the way that Japanese
people metabolise paritaprevir, it is possible to dose Viekira without Exviera.
Glossary
- oedema
Accumulation
of fluid below the skin or in the cavities of the body.
The GIFT-1 study was a phase III trial designed to evaluate
the safety and efficacy of ombitasvir and paritaprevir with ritonavir, dosed as
a fixed-dose once-daily tablet for 12 weeks, in Japanese people with genotype 1b
infection. Genotype 1b is the predominant form of hepatitis C in Japan,
accounting for at least 70% of cases.
The study enrolled previously untreated and
treatment-experienced patients. The double-blind study randomised 363 people in the
ratio 2:1 to receive ombitasvir and paritaprevir with ritonavir (n = 215), or to
placebo (n = 106) for 12 weeks. People with cirrhosis (n = 42) received open-label
active drug treatment. Participants were also stratified by baseline factors
that might affect response.
The primary study endpoint was virological response 12 weeks
after completion of treatment (SVR12). A total of 94.6% of participants without cirrhosis
and 90.5% of people with cirrhosis achieved SVR12 and there was no substantive
difference in virological response between previously untreated and
treatment-experienced participants (94.2% vs 96.1%).
Similarly there was no significant difference in a
pre-planned analysis of response according to baseline characteristics. Among
the previously untreated group, baseline viral load below 100,000 IU/ml or
ineligibility for interferon did not affect response. Among
treatment-experienced people, there was no difference in response according
to previous treatment non-response or relapse.
One on-treatment virologic failure occurred in a
treatment-experienced participant and one in a participant with cirrhosis. Seven people experienced virologic rebound after completing treatment and before 12
weeks post-treatment, while a further 6 people were lost to follow up or
discontinued treatment due to adverse events, and were also counted as
virologic failures in the analysis.
Nine people receiving
active drug experienced serious adverse events. The most common adverse events
were nasopharyngitis
(16.7%), headache (8.8%), and peripheral oedema (5.1%).